Here are my picks for best papers with a pro and con for each.
1 - "Going Around the World in The Lady from Shanghai: Transmedia Adaptation in the Work of Orson Welles"
Pro - uses unpublished archival material, interesting look at adaptation
Con - Orson Welles has been written about often
2 - "The Blues Brothers and Bollywood Masala Cinema"
Pro - original
Con - takes awhile to get into its point, connection to masala
3 - "Irreversible and Techniques of Looking"
Pro - look beyond the obvious subjects of eroticism/pornography to focus on the technical aspects
and how they presented difficult subject matter
Con - there was a paper about rape at last years festival
4 - "The Unfilmable Lightness of Being..."
Pro - interesting subject, well researched
Con - not a particularly easy read, have to focus to really follow it, not as engrossing as others
5 - "A Radical Expedition of Cinema's Birthplace: Popular Cinema, the Avent-Garde...."
Pro - topical, current
Con - mostly uses a basic film source (Gunning)
6 - "Boys Will Be Girls: How Alice Guy Challenged a Male Dominated Industry...."
Pro - not widely written about
Con - read like more of a book report, transitions need work
7 - "Tradition of Modern: Cinematic Expression of Ghosts in Japanese Films"
Pro - flows well, easy to read
Con - more of a summary/comparison of films, doesn't make a clear point/conclusion
8 - "Murders Unavenged: A Brief Look Into the Realism of the Police Procedural"
Pro - well written
Con - defining a genre rather than having an argument
9 - ""Cinema Du Corps and Avant Garde Cinematography..."
Pro - good to have a paper on the avant garde
Con - relies too heavily on sources, not enough original thought
10 - "The Active Viewer : Use of Multi-Screen Projection...."
Pro - interesting content, shows the variety of the medium of film
Con - more informative and personal opinion than using research to make a point
11 - "13 Ways of Looking at Bill Murray"
Pro - crowd pleaser
Con - more website article than scholarly paper
12 - "Pied Piper vs Faun: Storybooks ...."
Pro - considers a lot of sources
Con - unoriginal
No comments:
Post a Comment